Connor Farren vs Stefano Liokossis Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Farren vs S. Liokossis

Connor Farren
USA
l
l
w
l
w
l
w
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
31
Age
22
6'0" (183 cm)
Height
-
894
C. Rank
0
685
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-

Stefano Liokossis
CAN
w
l
w
l
w
l
w
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
31
Age
22
6'0" (183 cm)
Height
-
894
C. Rank
0
685
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Farren 1 - 0 Liokossis
They have played 2 sets in total, with Connor Farren winning 2 and Stefano Liokossis winning 0. The last match between Connor Farren and Stefano Liokossis was at the M15 Albuquerque, 28-09-2022, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Connor Farren getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Farren | 1 |
| Liokossis | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Albuquerque(09-28-22)
Connor Farren
6
6
Stefano Liokossis
3
1
C. Farren vs S. Liokossis H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 48.31% (200-214) | Career Total W/L | 42.03% (29-40) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Farren vs S. Liokossis Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Connor Farren has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Stefano Liokossis has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Connor Farren, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Stefano Liokossis has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Connor Farren has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Stefano Liokossis has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Connor Farren has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Stefano Liokossis winning 50.00% (W/L 2/2) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Connor Farren has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 191/191), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 20% (W/L 2/8). Stefano Liokossis has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 26/26), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 11% (W/L 1/8).
- Player level: In the last year, Connor Farren has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Stefano Liokossis has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50.00% of matches (W/L 2/2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Connor Farren winning 1 times and Stefano Liokossis being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Connor Farren winning 2 and Stefano Liokossis winning 0.
- The last match between Connor Farren and Stefano Liokossis was at the M15 Albuquerque, 28-09-2022, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Connor Farren getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:22:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Connor Farren has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Stefano Liokossis has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Connor Farren has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Stefano Liokossis has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Connor Farren has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Stefano Liokossis has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Connor Farren vs Stefano Liokossis Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Farren vs S. Liokossis H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:22:0 | Average Match Time | 1:22:0 |
| 42% (21/50) | 1st Serve % | 66% (39/59) |
| 76% (16/21) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (22/39) |
| 66% (19/29) | 2nd Serve Win % | 25% (5/20) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (1/2) |
| 54% (32/59) | Return Points Win % | 30% (15/50) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Farren 0%, Liokossis 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Farren 0%, Liokossis 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Farren 0%, Liokossis 0%.
C. Farren Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
QF | L | 7-6(2) 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
R2 | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
S. Liokossis Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | L | 7-5 6-3 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 6-1 | ||
Q2 | L | 4-6 6-3 10-5 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 6-2 | ||
Q2 | L | 6-1 6-0 | ||

C. Farren vs S. Liokossis Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 48.31% (200/214) | YTD Win/Loss | 42.03% (29/40) |
| 49.57% (463/471) | Sets Win/Loss | 40.94% (61/88) |
| 50.83% (4386/4242) | Games Win/Loss | 46.83% (635/721) |
| 50.00% (191/191) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.00% (26/26) |
| 20.00% (2/8) | Clay Win/Loss | 11.11% (1/8) |
| 31.82% (7/15) | Indoor Hard W/L | 25.00% (2/6) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 1111 | Aces Total | 15 |
| 0.32 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 1338 | Total Double Faults | 67 |
| 1:1:1 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 456.33 | Average Opponent Rank | 158.49 |
| 57% (9307/16251) | 1st Serve % | 60% (647/1073) |
| 69% (6394/9307) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (375/647) |
| 46% (3215/6944) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (199/426) |
| 40% (668/1674) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (29/63) |
| 40% (6474/16382) | Return Points Win % | 35% (342/988) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 28.13% (9/23) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.13% (191/190) | Futures W/L | 42.03% (29/40) |
| 49% (200/412) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 41% (28/68) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (46/101) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 17% (1/6) |
| 42% (44/105) | Deciding Set Win % | 67% (8/12) |
| 83% (211/175) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (29/26) |
| 17% (211/35) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (29/3) |
| 12% (203/25) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (40/3) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
04:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 16/11/25
Prediction12:10 AM 16/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 16/11/25
Prediction10:30 PM 15/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 17/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
15 Nov 2025
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Auger-Aliassime Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Auger-Aliassime H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Sinner Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Montevideo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Ignacio Buse vs Roman Andres Burruchaga Betting Tips & Picks November 15, 2025
15 Nov 2025
Kaja Juvan vs Sahaja Yamalapalli Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group G – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
22:30
H2H 4-3
H2H 0-0
17:45
H2H 0-0
17:50
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Orlando
United States
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico